Kup nowe:
174,13 zł
DARMOWA dostawa czwartek, 2 maja
Lub najszybsza dostawa jutro, 30 kwietnia. Zamów w ciągu 2 godz. 22 min
Dostępny
174,13 zł () Obejmuje wybrane opcje. Obejmuje początkową miesięczną płatność i wybrane opcje. Szczegóły
Cena
Suma częściowa
174,13 zł
Suma częściowa
Wstępny podział płatności
Koszt wysyłki, data dostawy i suma zamówienia (łącznie z podatkiem) są wyświetlone przy finalizacji zakupu.
Wysyłka z
Amazon
Wysyłka z
Amazon
Sprzedawane przez
Amazon
Sprzedawane przez
Amazon
Zwroty
Ten produkt podlega zwrotowi
Produkt podlega zwrotowi
W większości przypadków produkty wysyłane z serwisu Amazon.com można zwrócić i uzyskać pełen zwrot kosztów.
Zwroty
Ten produkt podlega zwrotowi
W większości przypadków produkty wysyłane z serwisu Amazon.com można zwrócić i uzyskać pełen zwrot kosztów.
Płatność
Bezpieczna transakcja
Twoja transakcja jest bezpieczna
Dokładamy wszelkich starań, aby zadbać o Twoje bezpieczeństwo i prywatność. Nasz system bezpieczeństwa płatności szyfruje Twoje dane podczas ich przekazywania. Nie przekazujemy danych Twojej karty kredytowej sprzedawcom zewnętrznym i nie sprzedajemy Twoich danych innym podmiotom.
Płatność
Bezpieczna transakcja
Dokładamy wszelkich starań, aby zadbać o Twoje bezpieczeństwo i prywatność. Nasz system bezpieczeństwa płatności szyfruje Twoje dane podczas ich przekazywania. Nie przekazujemy danych Twojej karty kredytowej sprzedawcom zewnętrznym i nie sprzedajemy Twoich danych innym podmiotom. Dowiedz się więcej

One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court Miękka oprawa – Ilustrowany, 16 kwietnia 2001

5,0 5,0 z 5 gwiazdek Liczba ocen: 6

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"174,13 zł","priceAmount":174.13,"currencySymbol":"zł","integerValue":"174","decimalSeparator":",","fractionalValue":"13","symbolPosition":"right","hasSpace":true,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"6AJVaosSbEA9VriME5CBm1UfmDEZcYJAa6TZ%2BlKnKi%2FRALXxibI71OytxAdU%2BX7aPcjRwG2Ad5BrhzKbPzs3aVnqEqDik75B94%2BW6b63%2FH48BinjusMNVid7TgXjhK82OqBn%2F7tgQCMfijhmenkuOh0ZdW3dXmXN","locale":"pl-PL","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Opcje zakupu i dodatki

Abortion, affirmative action, the "right to die," pornography and free speech, homosexuality and sex discrimination: as eagerly as the Supreme Court's rulings on these hot issues are awaited and as intently as they're studied, they never seem to settle anything once and for all. But something is settled in the process--in the incremental approach--as Cass Sunstein shows us in this instructive book.

One of America's preeminent constitutional scholars, Sunstein mounts a defense of the most striking characteristic of modern constitutional law: the inclination to decide one case at a time. Examining various controversies, he shows how--and why--the Court has avoided broad rulings on issues from the legitimacy of affirmative action to the "right to die," and in doing so has fostered rather than foreclosed public debate on these difficult topics. He offers an original perspective on the right of free speech and the many novel questions raised by Congress's efforts to regulate violent and sexual materials on new media such as the Internet and cable television. And on the relationship between the Constitution and homosexuality and sex discrimination, he reveals how the Court has tried to ensure against second-class citizenship--and the public expression of contempt for anyone--while leaving a degree of flexibility to the political process.

One Case at a Time also lays out, and celebrates, the remarkable constellation of rights--involving both liberty and equality--that now commands a consensus in American law. An authoritative guide to the Supreme Court, the book offers a new understanding of the American Constitution, and of the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism, and between rights and self-government.

Opis produktu

Recenzja

In One Case at a Time, Sunstein describes the current Supreme Court's 'judicial minimalism'--deciding cases as narrowly as possible, without widely applicable rules. This position, he urges, can support deliberative democracy, particularly if the issues involved are complex and no citizen consensus has emerged. Sunstein outlines his arguments and applies it in analyzing recent decisions on 'affirmative action, discrimination on the basis of sex and sexual orientation, the right to die, and new issues of free speech raised by...communications technologies.' He then addresses alternatives to minimalism, mainly Justice Scalia's 'democratic formalism' and the complaint that minimalist decisions lack theoretical depth as well as breadth, concluding by summarizing his view of the place of judicial minimalism in a democracy.--Mary Carroll "Booklist"

In a lucid examination of specific cases, Mr. Sunstein demonstrates how [judicial minimalism] should be done and achieves what has so far been elusive, a genuine theory of judicial minimalism, which many judges strive for but often have difficulty describing or justifying.-- "The Economist"

Sunstein is among this country's most respected legal scholars [and]
One Case at a Time reflects [his] mastery of Supreme Court law, of constitutional theory and of political science...One Case at a Time presents a fascinating argument: that there is a hidden majority of [judicial minimalist] Justices, that it is right in what it is doing and that it is adjudicating in a way that moves beyond the recent ideological stalemate about the Supreme Court's role...[Sunstein's] book demonstrates what a shame it is that the Clinton White House hasn't picked him to serve as a Federal judge. The Reagan and Bush Administrations put accomplished legal theorists on the bench to turn their conservative vision into legal reality. But the Clinton team has failed to follow the Reagan-Bush lead... One Case at a Time makes that reluctance look like a significant lost opportunity. Respectful of the political branches, mindful of the role of the Supreme Court in the whole of American government, this admirable book makes a judicious case for a philosophy of judging as a humble, difficult, essential art. The book also demonstrates that Sunstein would practice that art well.--Lincoln Caplan "New York Times Book Review"

With
One Case at a Time, Cass Sunstein may well become known as the Nathan Detroit of constitutional law. For this is a shrewd and clever book.--Gary McDowell "Washington Times"

With his new book, Sunstein joins a distinguished line of liberal constitutional theorists who have defended the democratic value of judicial modesty...[
One Case at a Time is] uniquely well-suited to an age that has lost its constitutional faith...No other scholar has captured the temper of the current majority as neatly as Sunstein, nor has anyone else attempted to provide a theoretical justification for what other observers took to be ad-hockery or improvisation. For these reasons, Sunstein's book deserves close attention.--Jeffrey Rosen "New Republic"

An original and deftly executed contribution to the voluminous literature on constitutional interpretation. Sunstein is utterly at home with the details of constitutional opinions and with recent work in political theory. Scrutinizing the work of the current Supreme Court in various legal domains, he urges the democratic merits of its caution. This is a book not just for professors and lawyers, but for citizens.--Don Herzog, University of Michigan Law School

Labeling and 'bean counting' of the Supreme Court and its Justices are frequently all that Americans get by way of description of the activities of the highest court in our system. Even the legal profession finds it is easier to label than to analyze. That is why Cass Sunstein's book is just what the country needs--an understandable analysis of how this Supreme Court goes about its decision making. If it seems to make the 'conservatives' the 'activists' and the 'liberals' the 'strict constructionists, ' that only proves that those labels are not very useful and more often than not reflect the eye of the beholder. Nor can Professor Sunstein's use of the word minimalism be dismissed as just another pretty label. The term aptly describes what has been the very touchstone of both the common law and constitutional theory in America for a long, long time. The book represents Sunstein at his best.--Abner J. Mikva, former Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Against the tide of those who lament the lost Warren Court or hunger for its conservative successor, Cass Sunstein argues that the current Supreme Court correctly avoids grand constitutional theories in favor of narrow decision making that leaves most matters of distribution and social justice to be decided by democratic majorities. Written with great lucidity, verve, and mastery of contemporary currents in political theory and constitutional law, this is the first judicial philosophy of and for the post-Bork appointees to the Court.--Kathleen M. Sullivan, Stanford Law School

O autorze

Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard and the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. He is the author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including Impeachment: A Citizen's Guide, Nudge (with Richard Thaler), Law and Leviathan (with Adrian Vermeule), How to Interpret the Constitution, On Freedom, and Can It Happen Here? Authoritarianism in America. He is a recipient of the Holberg Prize, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for the humanities and social sciences.

Szczegóły produktu

  • Wydawca ‏ : ‎ Harvard University Press; Edycja Revised ed. (16 kwietnia 2001)
  • Język ‏ : ‎ Angielski
  • Miękka oprawa ‏ : ‎ 304 str.
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0674005791
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0674005792
  • Wymiary ‏ : ‎ 15.56 x 1.75 x 23.5 cm
  • Recenzje klientów:
    5,0 5,0 z 5 gwiazdek Liczba ocen: 6

Opinie o produkcie

5 na 5 gwiazdek
5 na 5
6 ocen globalnych

Najlepsze opinie o produkcie z Polski

0 dostępnych opinii o produkcie oraz 0 ocen/y produktu z Polski

Najlepsze opinie o produkcie

Przetłumacz wszystkie opinie na język polski
Arthur R. Silen
5,0 z 5 gwiazdek Succinct analysis of how the Supreme Court decides cases
Opinia napisana w Stanach Zjednoczonych dnia 27 września 1999
This is an essential text for anyone interested in legal reasoning and legal process. I would go so far as to say it will be on the same bookshelf as Oliver Wendall Holmes and other great jurisprudential commentators. It should also be required reading for every law student, and their professors as well. Sunstein, a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School, gives clear, diagramatic analyses of the principles upon which the Supreme Court (and other courts and judges) base their decisions.
That having been said, this is neither a quick nor superficial read. It assumes the reader's familiarity with legal process and decisionmaking, and of the salient issues before the courts. Nevertheless, the overall result is deeply satisfying as a method of analysis. Anyone interested in law should buy the book, and read it, not once but several times.
20 użytkowników uznało opinię za pomocną
Zgłoś
Cliente
5,0 z 5 gwiazdek Five Stars
Opinia napisana w Stanach Zjednoczonych dnia 20 września 2015
Excellent product. The book is in perfect conditions as described!